Legal Opinion

State v. Peebles

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 19, 2010No. 2009AP3111-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOVER, PJ.

¶ 1. Ronnie Peebles appeals a judgment of conviction for first-degree sexual assault of a child and an order denying his postconviction motion. Peebles argues his .trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object, at Peebles' sentencing after revocation, to consideration of several admissions by Peebles, including that he had committed numerous prior sexual assaults. Peebles contends he was compelled to give the incriminating statements during counseling as a condition of his probation. He also asserts the statements were protected by the social worker-client privilege. We agree…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. SpaethWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. Gregory M. SahsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. Danny Robert AlexanderWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. Danny Robert AlexanderWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. Gregory M. SahsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API