Glos v. McBride
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County. S. E. Crow, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Action to quiet title. In addition to an allegation that plaintiff is owner of the land in fee simple and in possession thereof, it is alleged in the complaint that defendant, basing his right thereto upon a lease thereof made by plaintiff to defendant, the consideration of which “was in part that said plaintiff and said defendant (though not husband and wife) should live together on said parcel of land and should cohabit as man and wife,” unjustly and without right claims an interest in the land adverse to plaintiff; followed by the usual prayer for relief. To this complaint the court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Abbe v. MarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Gridley v. DornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Wright v. StewartU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Missouri · 1904
- Johnston v. RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Falkenberg v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Partmar Corp. v. Paramount Pictures Theatres Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Robertson v. HydeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Rodetsky v. NerneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Lozano v. BrantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Partmar Corp. v. Paramount Pictures Theatres Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954