Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Hyde

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 21, 1943No. Civ. 12329PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment for defendants entered after the trial court sustained defendants’ general demurrer to an amended complaint without leave to amend. The amended complaint purported to set forth two causes of action. The first prayed for the cancellation of a promissory note for $2,773.50 secured by a deed of trust, which it is alleged constituted a cloud on the title of plaintiffs to certain real property previously purchased by plaintiffs from defendant Sarah C. Hyde. The second cause of action was to recover $420.88 which plaintiffs had previously paid on the promissory…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McAllister v. DrapeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. City of Oakland v. California Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Brittan v. Oakland Bank of SavingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. City of Los Angeles v. WattersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Savings Bank of San Diego County v. BurnsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School District v. MannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Homestead Supplies, Inc. v. Executive Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Matchett v. GouldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Barry v. Oc Residential Properties, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Johnson v. SilverAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API