Legal Opinion

Lozano v. Brant

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 6, 1959No. Civ. 23603Published

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment entered on an order sustaining a demurrer to the first amended complaint, called the complaint, with leave to amend. Plaintiffs declined to amend and a judgment of dismissal followed. The sole question is whether the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The complaint alleges:

Count I

1. Plaintiffs are the owners of described real property in Los Angeles County.

2. Plaintiffs acquired the property subject to the terms and conditions of a written lease, made on or about September 12, 1956, between plaintiffs’ predecessors…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ephraim v. Metropolitan Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  2. King v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  3. Glos v. McBrideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API