Washel v. Bryant
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Rebecca Washel, d/b/a Hi-Tek Hair Body & Nails ("Washel!"), sued her former employee, Glenda Bryant, to enforce the terms of a non-competition provision in their employment agreement. Following a hearing, the trial court denied Washel's request for preliminary and permanent in-junctive relief. In this interlocutory appeal,1 Washel challenges that decision and raises the following restated issue: whether the trial court erred when it determined that Washel's remedy at law was adequate and denied her request for injunctive re-Hef.
We reverse.
FACTS AND…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Indiana Family and Social Services Administration v. Walgreen Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2002
- F. W. Means & Co. v. CarstensIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Barlow v. SipesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Gershin v. DemmingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Art Country Squire, L.L.C. v. Inland Mortgage Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Central Indiana Podiatry, P.C. v. KruegerIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Coates v. Heat Wagons, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Gleeson v. Preferred Sourcing, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Robert's Hair Designers, Inc. v. PearsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Pacific Kidney & Hypertension, LLC v. KassakianDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2016
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.