Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Tipton v. Smith

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 3, 1956No. 17179PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Legge, Justice.

The essential issue here involved is whether or not a certain proposal to amend Article X, § 5, of the Constitution of South Carolina was properly submitted to the voters in the general election of November 2, 1954.

Article X, § 5, imposes two limitations upon the power of a municipal corporation to incur bonded indebtedness, vis.: (a) that its bonded debt shall not exceed eight per cent of the assessed value of all taxable property within its boundaries; and (b) that “wherever there shall be several political divisions or municipal corporations covering or extending over the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Keenan v. PriceIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Bradley v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  3. State ex rel. Corry v. CooneyMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  5. Lane v. LukensIdaho Supreme Court · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kahalekai v. DoiHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court Given Under the Provisions of Section 3 of Article VI of the ConstitutionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
  3. Stackhouse v. FloydSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
  4. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
  5. Sprague v. CortesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API