Opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court Given Under the Provisions of Section 3 of Article VI of the Constitution
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
*235ANSWER OF THE JUSTICES
TO THE HONORABLE KENNETH M. CURTIS, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF MAINE:
In compliance with the provisions of Section 3 of Article VI of the Constitution of Maine, the undersigned Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court, having considered the questions submitted by Your Excellency, answer as follows:
QUESTION 1
Since the two questions are closely related and our answer to Question 2 will resolve the relevant issues raised by both questions, we deem it unnecessary to discuss Question 1 separately.
QUESTION 2
We answer Question 2 by fixing the expiration date as December 31, 1971.
Sect…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lane v. LukensIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
- Cummings v. EastmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1927
- Ex Parte Tipton v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
3Cited by8 opinions
- Common Cause v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- State v. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
- In re 1983 Legislative Apportionment of House, Senate, and Congressional DistrictsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- Lockman v. Secretary of StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- DESENA v. MaineDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.