Legal Opinion

Opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court Given Under the Provisions of Section 3 of Article VI of the Constitution

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 3, 1971PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*235ANSWER OF THE JUSTICES

TO THE HONORABLE KENNETH M. CURTIS, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF MAINE:

In compliance with the provisions of Section 3 of Article VI of the Constitution of Maine, the undersigned Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court, having considered the questions submitted by Your Excellency, answer as follows:

QUESTION 1

Since the two questions are closely related and our answer to Question 2 will resolve the relevant issues raised by both questions, we deem it unnecessary to discuss Question 1 separately.

QUESTION 2

We answer Question 2 by fixing the expiration date as December 31, 1971.

Sect…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lane v. LukensIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Cummings v. EastmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1927
  3. Ex Parte Tipton v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Common Cause v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
  3. In re 1983 Legislative Apportionment of House, Senate, and Congressional DistrictsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  4. Lockman v. Secretary of StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  5. DESENA v. MaineDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API