Legal Opinion

United States v. Dorsey

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided March 24, 1988No. ACM 26177 (recon)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION UPON RECONSIDERATION

LEWIS, Judge:

By a prior, split opinion we set aside the findings of guilty and sentence in this case. United States v. Dorsey, 25 M.J. 728 (A.F. C.M.R.1987). We found that a pretrial agreement provision whereby the appellant waived his right to contest the validity of a search violated the prohibition against waivers of rights as set forth in Air Force Regulation (A.F.R.) 111-1, Military Justice Guide, para. 4-5h (1 August 1984). Following our earlier line of decisions starting with United States v. Saulter, 23 M.J. 626 (A.F.C.M.R.1986), we found the agreement…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. JonesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  2. United States v. BrickeyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  3. United States v. SaulterU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1986
  4. United States v. SilvaU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
  5. United States v. DorseyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. JacksonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
  2. United States v. ReedU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988
  3. United States v. MayfieldNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  4. United States v. DawsonUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API