Legal Opinion

United States v. Mayfield

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided October 16, 1995No. NMCM 95 00047PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DeCICCO, Senior Judge:

In this case, we hold that the absence of a request for trial by military judge alone by the accused prior to assembly of a court-martial composed of a military judge alone is jurisdictional error, and that such a request in a post-trial session does not cure the error.

I. Background

Pursuant to his guilty pleas at a general court-martial, the appellant was convicted of the wrongful use and distribution of marijuana in violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice [UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. § 912a. The military judge sentenced him to be confined for 6 months, to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Runkle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Swaim v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. United States v. DeanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  4. Keyes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. United States v. NixUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  2. United States v. MayfieldCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  3. United States v. TurnerNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API