Legal Opinion
Clark v. Feder Semo & Bard, P.C.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 28, 2008No. Civil Action 07-0470 (JDB)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
Plaintiff Denise Clark has brought this action pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., regarding the Feder, Semo and Bard, P.C. Retirement Plan and Trust (“Plan”). Currently before the Court is Clark’s motion for leave to amend the complaint. Upon careful consideration of the motion, the parties’ memoranda, the applicable law, and the entire record, the Court will grant Clark’s motion for leave to amend.
BACKGROUND
Clark filed a two-count complaint in this Court on March 13, 2007,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Pfahler v. National Latex Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- LaRue v. DeWolff, Boberg & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ellis v. Georgetown University HospitalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Driscoll v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Normandy Apartments, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- DOES I THROUGH III v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Zalduondo v. Aetna Life InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.