McGrath v. Montedonico
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Deborah McGrath, No. CV-19-08201-PCT-DWL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Joseph Montedonico, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pending before the Court is the motion to withdraw as counsel of record without 16 client consent (Doc. 24) filed by Plaintiffs’ counsel, Matthew Scott Martin and the Law 17 Office of Matthew Scott Martin, LLC (together, “Counsel”). 18 Local Rule 83.3(b) provides various procedural requirements that must be met when 19 an attorney withdraws from representation of a client (except for a change…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Leonard S. Siegel and Martin B. AbramsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Team Obsolete Ltd. v. A.H.R.M.A. Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- Lewis Woodall and Kadir Mutlu v. The Drake Hotel, Inc., an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Sabre International Security v. Torres Advanced Enterprise Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.