Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Stokes

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1951No. 7679PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

Plaintiff sued to recover the value of improvements he placed on property under our “occupying’ claimant” statute. The trial court concluded that the improvements were not made in good faith; and awarded plaintiff only the amount expended by him for real property taxes, plus interest. Plaintiff appeals.

He challenges the trial court’s judgment urging: (1) That the court erred in its determination that the improvements were not made in good faith; and (2) That the defendant is estopped by laches from asserting lack of good faith on the part of the plaintiff.

The occupying…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reimann Et Ux. v. Baum Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Day v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Peterson v. Weber CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Doyle v. West Temple Terrace Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hidden Meadows Development Co. v. MillsUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Fouser v. PaigeIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Ute-Cal Land Development Corp. v. SatherUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Hidden Meadows Development Co. v. MillsUtah Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API