Legal Opinion

Warren v. Britton

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1882No. 10,349PublishedCited by 18 opinions

From the Vanderburgh Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

This was an agreed ease, under the provisions of section 553, R. S. 1881, wherein the appellee was plaintiff and the appellants were the defendants below. The agreed statement of facts, omitting merely fornlal matters, was, in substance, as follows:

“ Said plaintiff is the duly elected, qualified and acting treasurer of Vanderburgh county, and has been such treasurer for more than one year last past; that, the defendant "William Warren is the duly elected, qualified and acting auditor of said county, and has been for more than one year last past; that the other defendants are the boai’d of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shoemaker v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Clare v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Fry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. McComas v. KrugIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. GerhardtIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Parker v. State ex rel. PowellIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MontgomeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Henderson v. State ex rel. StoutIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Barnett v. HarshbargerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API