Legal Opinion

Fry v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1878PublishedCited by 27 opinions

From -the Marion Criminal Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, C. J.

The indictment against the appellant, in this case, charged, in substance, that the appellant, on the 9th day of January, 1879, at and in the county of Marion, “ did then and there unlawfully barter and sell, for a valuable consideration, to wit, the sum of ten dollars, to some person whose name is to the grand jurors unknown, a railroad ticket, the description and style of -which said ticket is to the grand jurors unknown, for the reason that said ticket is lost and can not be found, entitling and evidencing the right of the holder thereof, to wit, the person whose name is to the grand…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Railroad Co. v. HusenSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Smith v. TurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
  4. Henderson v. Mayor of the City of New York Commissioners of Immigration v. North German LloydSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Patterson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1879

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Hedderich v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Hockett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. New v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Wilkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. State ex rel. Duensing v. RobyIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API