McComas v. Krug
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Montgomery Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.
In this case, the appellee, the defendant below demurred separately to each of the first, second and third paragraphs of the appellant’s complaint, upon the grounds that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; that the State of Indiana was a necessary party plaintiff, and that appellant had not the legal capacity to sue herein. These demurrers were severally sustained by the court, and to each of these rulings the appellant excepted. He refused to amend or plead further, and judgment was rendered against him for the appellee’s costs.
Errors are assigned by the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- Stocking v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
- Beauchamp v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1842
- Maize v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1853
- Brown v. BuzanIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- City of Evansville v. State ex rel. BlendIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Hedderich v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Hancock v. YadenIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Schmidt v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- State ex rel. Devening v. BartholomewIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.