Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Vance
Indiana Court of Appeals
Prom Grant Circuit Court; H. J. Paulus, Judge. Action by Walter W. Vance against The Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtHottel, C. J.
This is an action brought under §5436 Burns 1914, §4025 R. S. 1881, for damages for injuries to a horse which strayed from appellee’s enclosure and after-wards entered on appellant’s right of way through an opening in appellant’s fence. A demurrer to the complaint was overruled, and the cause was put at issue by a general denial. A trial by jury resulted in a verdict in appellee’s favor for $120. A motion for new trial was overruled and judgment rendered on the verdict.
1. The ruling on the demurrer to the complaint, and the' ruling on the motion for new trial are each assigned as error and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Domestic Block Coal Co. v. DeArmeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Warner v. MarshallIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Gregory v. ArmsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- Young v. MontgomeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Haney v. MeyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966
- Fehlman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
- Burke v. BurkeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. CampbellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
- In Re the Appeal of Associated Sign & Post, IncIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.