Legal Opinion

Cloutier v. City of Berlin

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 2, 2006No. 2005-342PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.

The plaintiff, Debra A. Cloutier, sued the defendant, City of Berlin, for personal injuries and economic losses that she suffered while operating her vehicle on one of its streets. The jury returned a verdict for the City. The plaintiff appeals an order of the Superior Court (Houran, J.) denying her post-trial motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial. The City cross-appeals the denial of its pre-trial motion for summary judgment. We affirm the trial court’s denial of the plaintiff’s post-trial motion and do not reach the issues raised in the City’s cross-appeal.

The record reflects…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Carson v. MaurerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  2. State v. BlackmerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  3. City of Dover v. Imperial Casualty & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  4. Minuteman, LLC v. Microsoft Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  5. Carlisle v. Frisbie Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Goudreault v. KleemanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  2. Petition of KiltonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  3. In Re the Liquidation of the Home InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  4. Appeal of Parkland Medical CenterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  5. New Hampshire Ass'n of Counties v. Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API