Minuteman, LLC v. Microsoft Corp.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.
The plaintiffs, Minuteman, LLC and Ronald H. Proulx, appeal an order of the Superior Court {Ijynn, J.) dismissing their claim against the defendant, Microsoft Corporation, for allegedly violating New Hampshire’s antitrust statute. RSA ch. 356 (1995). We affirm.
The relevant facts follow. Plaintiff Proulx purchased a “Millenia Max 65133” personal computer from J&B Diversified Associates in Manchester. The “Windows 98” operating system software was included with the purchase and was installed by the store. Plaintiff Minuteman, LLC owned a computer in which it had been using the “Windows 95”…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- California v. ARC America Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Vogel v. VogelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Kansas v. UtiliCorp United Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Johnson v. Microsoft Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2005
- Elkins v. Microsoft Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- Remsburg v. Docusearch, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- Bunker's Glass Co. v. PILKINGTON, PLCArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- DeBenedetto v. CLD Consulting Engineers, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.