Legal Opinion

Latt v. Schwehm

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 21, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Soot, C. C. J.

This ease comes to me for trial without a jury.

From the evidence and exhibits marked in evidence, it appears that on November 6th, 1926, plaintiffs agreed, in writing, under seal, to convey to defendant certain real estate in Atlantic City for a consideration of $60,000 to be paid as follows:

$2,000 upon signing of agreement.

$30,000 by the assumption of an existing first mortgage.

$15,000 by the assumption of an existing second mortgage.

$3,300 in mortgages to be assigned.

$9,700 cash at settlement.

Settlement was in fact made as of February 7th, 1927.

Subsequent to the settlement…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. Colonial Woodworking Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
  2. Curtiss-Warner Corp. v. ThirkettleNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  3. Janitscheck v. Melbro Realty Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1931
  4. Ireland v. Penn Motors Corp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  5. Merchants & Traders Developing Co. v. Mercer Realty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Weinberg v. WilenskyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  2. Tomlinson v. Warner Bros. Theatres, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API