Legal Opinion

Curtiss-Warner Corp. v. Thirkettle

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided July 27, 1926PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a suit to forclose a purchase-money mortgage on which it is admitted there is an unpaid balance of $1,206.50, with interest, from October 24th, 1922. The defendants set up, by way of counter-claim, their right to an abatement — first, of the sum of $1,000, representing the increased price of the lot purchased on the basis of its being a corner lot, which it was not, and second, of the cost of construction of cement sidewalks and curbs the full length of the lot on the street, which the lot was supposed to abut, but did not.

The original mortgage was in the sum of $2,000, was given to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Roberts v. JamesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
  2. Hawthorne v. OdensonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1923
  3. Kuhnen v. ParkerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1897
  4. Shannon v. MarselisNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1831
  5. Holloway v. HendrickSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Deerhurst Estates v. Meadow Homes, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  2. Atlantic City Hospital v. FinkleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  3. Magna Mfg. v. Aetna Cas.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1941
  4. Bruen v. SpannhakeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
  5. Campbell v. HellerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API