Tomlinson v. Warner Bros. Theatres, Inc.
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
Complainants seek to recover from defendants the amount of a deficiency arising out of a sale under a mortgage foreclosure.
The defendants are a Mr. and Mrs. Handle, mortgagors, and Warner Bros. Theatres, Inc., their grantee of the mortgaged premises.
Warner Bros. move to strike the bill because "the bill of complaint discloses neither an express agreement of assumption" on its part "nor facts from which an agreement to pay can be implied."
Complainant alleges that there was a direct assumption of payment on the part of Warner Bros. Theatres, Inc., that there was an implied or equitable…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Green v. StoneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
- Dieckman v. WalserSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Reeves v. CordesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
- Crowell v. Hospital of Saint BarnabasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1876
- Klapworth v. DresslerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1860
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Camden Trust Co. v. HandleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941
- Fid. Union Trust v. Prudent Invest.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1941