Goldsmith v. Hazelwood
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, P. J.
The defendants contend that the plaintiff is barred from a recovery by reason of her own negligent failure to exercise ordinary care for her own safety. Counsel cites in support of this theory Mattox v. Atlanta Enterprises, 91 Ga. App. 847 (87 S. E. 2d 432). In that case the plaintiff brought an action for damages, based on the alleged negligence of Atlanta Enterprises, Inc., resulting in certain injuries to the plaintiff, the plaintiff alleging that the defendant corporation operated a motion picture theatre and charged a fee for admission. The plaintiff, upon inquiring of an usher as to the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Tybee Amusement Co. v. OdumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Scott v. Rich's Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Pilgreen v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Lane Drug Stores Inc. v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
- Firestone Service Stores Inc. v. GillenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Wakefield v. AR Winter Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Pound v. Augusta National, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Chotas v. J. P. Allen & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Atkinson v. Kirchoff Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Sutton v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.