Legal Opinion
Pilgreen v. Hanson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 10, 1954No. 34790PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.
The trial court’s action in overruling the gen- ' eral demurrers to the petition presents two major questions for decision: (a) Is the defendant’s negligence sufficiently alleged to present a question for determination by the jury? (b) If so, do the allegations of the petition show as a matter of law that the plaintiff was herself guilty of such negligence as to bar a recovery by her? .
A rather painstaking perusal of the allegations of the petition has led us to the conclusion that the answer to the first question is yes, while that to the second is no. In reaching this conclusion we have…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fuller v. InmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Fuller v. Louis Steyerman & Sons Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Lebby v. Atlanta Realty Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
- Holman v. American Automobile Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Wardlaw v. Executive Committee of the Baptist ConventionCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Redding v. Sinclair Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Kreiss v. Allatoona Landing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Roberts v. WickerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Etheridge Motors, Inc. v. HaynieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Boggs v. Griffeth Bros. Tire Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.