Legal Opinion

Arnold v. General Motors Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1998No. Docket 108178PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Bemetta Arnold 1 suffered a work-related injury while employed by defendant General Motors Corporation. Despite her partial disability, she performed lighter duty work, both for General Motors and for a subsequent employer, Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation (smart). Her work for smart aggravated a back condition to the point that she could no longer work.

The issue raised by the present appeal is whether, under subsection 301(5) of the Worker’s Disability Compensation Act, 2 Ms. Arnold is entitled to benefits from General Motors based on her wages at the time of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dressler v. Grand Rapids Die Casting Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Pulver v. Dundee Cement Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Mullins v. DURA CORPORATIONMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Lee v. Koegel MeatsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Johnson v. DePree Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Perez v. Keeler Brass Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Maier v. GENERAL TELEPHONE CO.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Toth v. Autoalliance International, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Nichols v. Howmet Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Nichols v. Howmet Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API