First National Bank v. Holan
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Marshall county, Ives, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
Action upon a joint and several negotiable promissory note. Verdict for the defendants, and the plaintiff appealed *526from an order denying its motion for a new trial as to all of the defendants.
The first paragraph of the complaint alleges the corporate capacity of the plaintiff, the second that on April 10,1891, the defendants, 16 in number, made and delivered their promissory note, dated on that day, to Kingsland Brothers, and thereby promised, for value received, to pay to them or order $2,000, — $500 thereof on May 1, 1892; $700 on May 1, 1893, and $800 on May 1, 1894, with interest at 8 per…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wilson v. HayesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Selover v. BryantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Bank of Montreal v. RichterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Ames v. Cannon River Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
- Yellow Medicine County Bank v. WigerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- McNight v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Benton County Savings Bank of Norway v. BoddickerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Shelling State Bank v. ClasenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Vickery v. BurtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
- Albrecht v. RathaiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.