Yellow Medicine County Bank v. Wiger
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff, the Yellow Medicine County Bank, from an order of the District Court of Becker County, D. B. Searle, J., made' July 21, 1894, denying its motion for a new trial after verdict for all of the eighteen defendants. The plaintiff’s third assignment of error mentioned in the opinion was as follows: Third.
Read the full summary
Appeal by plaintiff, the Yellow Medicine County Bank, from an order of the District Court of Becker County, D. B. Searle, J., made' July 21, 1894, denying its motion for a new trial after verdict for all of the eighteen defendants. The plaintiff’s third assignment of error mentioned in the opinion was as follows: Third. The court erred in overruling plaintiff’s objections to the evidence of divers defendants to the effect that subsequent to the execution of the note sued upon they settled their liability by the execution of their individual notes.
1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.
It is alleged in the eomplaint that the defendants, on the 11th day of January, A. D. 1892, made and delivered their promissory note to one Byron S. Fryor, whereby they promised, for a valuable consideration, to pay him the sum of $2,000 in three installments, as follows: $600, January 11, 1893; $700, January 11, 1894; and $700, January 11, 1895, — with interest at eight per cent, per annum, payable annually; and that the payee, Byron S. Fryor, indorsed, sold, and delivered said note to plaintiff, before maturity, for value, in the usual and ordinary course of business, and the plaintiff…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Davis v. FrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
- First National Bank v. HolanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Cook v. KittsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Kretzschmar v. MeehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Johnson County Savings Bank v. WeibySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.