Murdock v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtGross, J.
Fresnel Atilus was shot and killed while operating his ice cream truck in Lake Park, Florida. At trial, the State’s theory of the case was that appellant, Michael Murdock, was guilty of first-degree murder and attempted robbery with a firearm as a principal.1 A jury found Murdock guilty as charged. We reverse because the police misinformed Murdock about his Fifth Amendment rights and failed to correct the misinformation before Murdock gave an incriminating statement.
There were no eyewitnesses to the actual shooting, but two witnesses saw men flee from the scene of the crime. The victim’s…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bannister v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Reynoldo Martin-Godinez v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Lavonte Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- MELANIE EAM v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020
- MELANIE EAM v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.