Legal Opinion
Carr v. SAIF Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 12, 1983No. WCB 80-00053; CA A23840PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*112WARREN, J.
Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board, affirming the suspension of his temporary total disability benefits under ORS 656.325 and the administrative rules adopted thereunder, because claimant failed to attend a medical examination scheduled for him by SAIF. Claimant contends that the suspension was unlawful, because he had notified SAIF of a valid reason why he would not be able to attend the scheduled examination. He also contends that the procedures employed by the Workers’ Compensation Department (Department) under ORS 656.325 and OAR 436-54-281 and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Beckler v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Tam v. Kaiser PermanenteHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
- Koskela v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Trujillo v. Pacific Safety SupplyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Logsdon v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.