Legal Opinion

Logsdon v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 8, 2002No. 99-00431; A109321PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*319LANDAU, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (board), challenging the adequacy of the board’s award of benefits and the failure of the board to permit him to engage in cross-examination of two physicians who provided medical opinions on reconsideration concerning the date that he became medically stationary. We affirm, writing only to address the board’s failure to permit claimant to cross-examine the physicians.

The pertinent facts are not in dispute. Claimant compensably injured his right knee in 1981. He received an award of scheduled permanent disability.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Koskela v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Carr v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Trujillo v. Pacific Safety SupplyOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Trujillo v. Pacific Safety SupplyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. Mount v. Department of Consumer & Business ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. Sachdev v. Oregon Medical BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  5. Bledsoe v. City of Lincoln CityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API