Koskela v. Willamette Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*231LINDER, J.
Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board (board) order awarding him permanent partial disability (PPD) rather than permanent total disability (PTD). The petition for review raises only one issue: whether the administrative procedures for determining the extent of the permanent disability — in particular, the process for reconsideration and hearing — satisfy the requirements of the federal Due Process Clause. We hold that they do and affirm.
Claimant, who is approximately 60 years old, has a history of extensive temporomandibular joint (TMJ) difficulty, which involves…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Koskela v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
- Veselik v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Everett v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Beaver v. NPC International, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2006
- In re LakatosSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.