Legal Opinion

Koskela v. Willamette Industries, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 17, 1999No. WCB 95-08576; CA A97325PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*231LINDER, J.

Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board (board) order awarding him permanent partial disability (PPD) rather than permanent total disability (PTD). The petition for review raises only one issue: whether the administrative procedures for determining the extent of the permanent disability — in particular, the process for reconsideration and hearing — satisfy the requirements of the federal Due Process Clause. We hold that they do and affirm.

Claimant, who is approximately 60 years old, has a history of extensive temporomandibular joint (TMJ) difficulty, which involves…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Koskela v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Veselik v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. Everett v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. Beaver v. NPC International, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2006
  5. In re LakatosSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API