Legal Opinion

Trujillo v. Pacific Safety Supply

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 8, 2002No. 96-10056; A99410PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*304LANDAU, J.

The Oregon Supreme Court remanded this workers’ compensation case to us for reconsideration in light of its decision in Koskela v. Willamette Industries, Inc., 331 Or 362, 15 P3d 548 (2000). In our original opinion, Trujillo v. Pacific Safety Supply, 159 Or App 350, 978 P2d 1037 (1999), we reversed and remanded for reconsideration the Workers’ Compensation Board’s (board) order awarding claimant permanent partial disability. We rejected claimant’s contention that he had a constitutional right to testify at an oral hearing concerning the rating of his base functional capacity (BFC),…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Landon v. PlasenciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Koskela v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Carr v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. Logsdon v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Trujillo v. Pacific Safety SupplyOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Mount v. Department of Consumer & Business ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. Pietrzykowski v. Albertsons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  5. State v. P. F.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API