Legal Opinion
Grimberg v. Admiral Oriental S. S. Line
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided July 7, 1924No. 8339PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUSHMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, complaining, alleges that he elects to sue defendant at law, with the right of trial by jury, as provided by section 33 of the Act of June 5, 1920, Merchant Marine Act of 1920, or Jones Act, section 8337a, Comp. Stat. Supp. of 1923, 41 Stat. at Large, 1007, for the recovery of full compensation for certain injuries sustained by him upon a vessel operated by defendant; that plaintiff was a night watchman upon said vessel, and was injured while the vessel was upon a voyage from Japan to Seattle. The injury is alleged to have been caused by plaintiff tripping…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Chelentis v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- The Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Warner v. GoltraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- The Arizona v. AnelichSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. Norfolk-Berkley Bridge CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1928
- South Atlantic Steamship Co. v. MunkacsySupreme Court of Delaware · 1936
- McGeorge v. Charles Nelson Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.