Legal Opinion

South Atlantic Steamship Co. v. Munkacsy

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided July 7, 1936No. 1; No. 119PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Layton, C. J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

The plaintiff in error excepted to the rulings of the trial judge sustaining objections, interposed at the trial, to certain questions and answers contained in the deposition of the boatswain, Rogers. Error is claimed in that the testimony elicited by the questions was of real probative value and pertinent to the issue of proximate cause, and also in that the defendant in error waived all right to object to the depositions at the trial.

With respect to the first ground of error, the argument of the plaintiff in error runs in this fashion: the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Robertson v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Commonwealth v. PierceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  3. Griffin v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Island Express, Inc. v. FrederickSupreme Court of Delaware · 1934
  5. Clowes v. The Frank & WillieDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1891

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Robelen Piano Company v. Di FonzoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1961
  2. Commonwealth v. HaleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. Wagner v. ShanksSupreme Court of Delaware · 1963
  4. Elliott v. CamperSuperior Court of Delaware · 1937
  5. O'Riley v. RogersSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API