Legal Opinion

United Therapeutics Corporation v. Vanderbilt University

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 15, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2016-2220PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

‘ REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge

This' cáse arises from a dispute over the ownership of two patents that were cooperatively developed by the plaintiff, United Therapeutics Corporation (“United Therapeutics”), and the defendants, Vanderbilt University (“Vanderbilt”) and Dr. James E. Loyd. See Complaint (“Compl.”) ¶¶ 1, 3. United Therapeutics seeks damages and a declaratory judgment finding that “[Dr.] Loyd and Vanderbilt have no rights, title or interest in the [p]atents, and that [United Therapeutics] is the rightful exclusive owner by assignment of all…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rinat Akhmetshin v. William BrowderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
  2. Akhmetshin v. BrowderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. Relman, Dane & Colfax Pllc v. Fair Housing Council of San Fernando ValleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
  4. Rinat Akhmetshin v. William BrowderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API