State v. Robinson
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REX D. DAVIS, Justice.
Paul Robinson, charged with driving while intoxicated (second offense), filed a motion to suppress blood-test evidence, which the trial court granted. The State appeals, asserting in one issue that the trial court erred in granting the motion. We will affirm.
Jurisdiction
We first address Robinson’s assertion that we lack jurisdiction because the State’s notice of appeal was untimely. The trial court orally granted the motion to suppress at the conclusion of a May 14, 2008 hearing. The trial judge then signed an order that states:
On May 14 [italics in handwriting],…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Amador v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State of Texas v. Robinson, Paul DavidCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- State of Texas v. Robinson, Paul DavidCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- State v. Robinson, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2010
- State v. RobinsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- State v. RobinsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011