Hahn v. Andrews
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Chidsey,
This is an appeal from a judgment for the defendants entered on a verdict in their favor in a replevin action. The plaintiff-appellant assigns as error the refusal of his motions for a new trial and for judgment non obstante veredicto.
On or about August 16, 1948 the plaintiff entered into an oral contract with the defendants. Although plaintiff contended that the terms of this contract were that he would pay $2,500 and receive defendants’ fuel oil truck, the jury’s verdict establishes that the terms were, in accordance with the defendants’ claim, that plaintiff…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Frech v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Lee-Strauss Co. v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Westinghouse Air Brake Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Summerson v. HicksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
- Hale v. Borough of AshlandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
3Cited by8 opinions
- Advanced Power Systems, Inc. v. Hi-Tech Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. CaiazzoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Occidental Fire And Casualty Company Of North Carolina v. Joseph L. BrociousCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Speck Cadillac-Olds, Inc. v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Hahn v. AndrewsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.