Legal Opinion
East Quincy Services District v. Continental Insurance
District Court, E.D. California
Decided October 4, 1994No. CIV-S-93-1163PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
LEVI, District Judge.
Plaintiff East Quincy Services District (“the District”) and defendant Continental Insurance Company (“Continental”) bring cross-motions for summary judgment regarding Continental’s duty to defend and indemnify the District under the terms of their insurance policies.
The District filed suit seeking a declaratory judgment that Continental must defend and indemnify the District in a Plumas County Superior Court action, Janet Laurie Joseph, et al. v. East Quincy Services District, Civ. No. 16034, and now moves for summary judgment on…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Horace Mann Ins. Co. v. Barbara B.California Supreme Court · 1993
- Northern Insurance Company of New York v. Aardvark Associates, Inc. And Insurance Company of North America, Aardvark Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Titan Holdings Syndicate, Inc. v. The City of Keene, New HampshireCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- MacKinnon v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Housing Authority Risk Retention Group, Inc. v. Chicago Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Martin Marietta Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Legarra v. Federated Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- J. JOSEPHSON v. Crum & ForsterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.