Legal Opinion

Kinney v. Yoelin Bros. Mercantile Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 3, 1923No. 10,808PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

*296Dependant in Error moves to strike bill of exceptions because not filed within sixty days after final judgment nor within any extension lawfully granted. Code 1921, § 420; Mosher v. Lustick, 66 Colo. 455, 182 Pac. 886; Ransom v. Holland, 66 Colo. 420, 182 Pac. 885.

The judgment was rendered February 1, 1923. February 5th, a motion for new trial was filed wdiich was never heard and was therefore automatically overruled at the end of the next succeeding term, which was May 12, 1923. The judgment, therefore, became final on that date. Bates v. Woodward, 66 Colo. 555, 185 Pac. 351. The bill was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bates v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  2. Armstrong v. GreshamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  3. Ransom v. HollandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  4. Chamberlin v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  5. Mosher v. LustickSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Andrews v. LullSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  2. Charles v. SprottSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  3. Eltzroth v. MurphySupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  4. Andrews v. LullSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  5. Andrews v. LullSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API