Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Gresham

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 5, 1921No. 10,200PublishedCited by 9 opinions

On motion to dismiss writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

Gresham, the defendant below, had a verdict, April 22, 1921. Ten days were allowed for a motion for a new trial; the plaintiff filed no such motion, but, on the 2nd of May,' filed a motion for judgment non obstante veredicto. June 7th, this motion was denied; thereupon the court made an order that a motion for a new trial was unnecessary.

Rule 8 is as follows:

“The party claiming error in the trial of any case must, unless otherwise ordered by the trial court, move that court for a new trial, and, without such order, only- questions presented in such motion will be considered on review.”

Gresham…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Keenan v. Colorado Farm Lands Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1918

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. HollandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
  2. Fincher v. Edwin M. Bosworth & Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  3. Kinney v. Yoelin Bros. Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  4. Larimore v. HowellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  5. Steere v. McCombSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API