Armstrong v. Gresham
Supreme Court of Colorado
On motion to dismiss writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison
Gresham, the defendant below, had a verdict, April 22, 1921. Ten days were allowed for a motion for a new trial; the plaintiff filed no such motion, but, on the 2nd of May,' filed a motion for judgment non obstante veredicto. June 7th, this motion was denied; thereupon the court made an order that a motion for a new trial was unnecessary.
Rule 8 is as follows:
“The party claiming error in the trial of any case must, unless otherwise ordered by the trial court, move that court for a new trial, and, without such order, only- questions presented in such motion will be considered on review.”
Gresham…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Keenan v. Colorado Farm Lands Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1918
3Cited by9 opinions
- Blanchard v. HollandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
- Fincher v. Edwin M. Bosworth & Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1924
- Kinney v. Yoelin Bros. Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1923
- Larimore v. HowellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
- Steere v. McCombSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.