Legal Opinion

Eltzroth v. Murphy

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 3, 1923No. 10,470PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

There is a motion to strike the bill of exceptions because not filed in time; i. e., within sixty days from the judgment, under S. L. 1911, p. 9 (Code 1921, § 420). A motion for a new trial may be heard at the next term succeeding that at which the judgment is rendered, but not after (Bates v. Woodward, 66 Colo. 555, 185 Pac. 351), unless there be an order of court or waiver (66 Colo. 559, 185 Pac. 351).

In the present case the motion was not heard until after the end of “the succeeding term,” and there was. no order of court. It is claimed, however, that the appearance of plaintiff in error…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. HodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. The United States, in Error v. Phineas Bradley, Surviving Administrator of David Ott DeceasedSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
  3. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897
  4. Jackson v. ShawlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Osgood v. Bauder & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1888

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fleishbein v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API