Legal Opinion · Dissent

Andrews v. Lull

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 29, 1959No. 18939Published

1DissentJustice Doyle

I respectfully disagree with the conclusion reached by the majority that the district court lacked jurisdiction and that the rule to show cause should be made absolute. My difference with the majority opinion stems from my interpretation of the statute .that a motion for new trial may properly be filed following the rendition of a judgment of the county court. On this premise the respondent Lull satisfied the requirements of C.R.S. 1953, 37-6-11, which provides that the appeal from the county court must be made within 10 days after the judgment is “rendered.” The reasons for my conclusions…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Niles v. ShinkleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  2. Bates v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  3. Kinney v. Yoelin Bros. Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  4. Charles v. SprottSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API