Legal Opinion

Pierson v. Swift County Bank

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 29, 1925No. 24,524PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, 0.

Plaintiffs, residents of Muscatine, Iowa, made a contract to sell a farm in Swift county, Minnesota, to the Wilmers Land Agency of Benson in that county. The Wilmers Land Agency in turn made a contract to sell the farm to George B. Bingham. It was arranged that the deed should run direct from plaintiffs to Bingham, and that Bingham should give hack a mortgage to plaintiffs for the deferred part of the purchase price. A cash payment of $5,000 was to he made on March 1, 1920, at which time the deed and mortgage back were .to be delivered. On March 24, 1920, the land agency deposited…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Woodhouse v. CrandallIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Stoller v. CoatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  3. First Nat. Bank v. HummelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  4. Anderson v. Pacific BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Fogg v. TylerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1912

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Farmers State Bank v. Sig Ellingson & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. Blummer v. Scandinavian American State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. Milne v. Capital Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. Hjelle v. VeigelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. Adams v. Farmers State Bank of OliviaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API