Legal Opinion

Woodhouse v. Crandall

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1902PublishedCited by 73 opinions

Appeal from the Branch Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Axel Chytraus, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright

On March 15, 1893, Charles F. Woodhouse leased to F. P. Furlong certain premises in the city of Chicago. The lease recited that Furlong had deposited with Meadowcroft Bros., bankers, as security for the faithful performance of his covenants contained in the lease, the sum of $1500, which was to remain with Meadowcroft Bros, until the expiration of the lease, for the purpose of paying to Woodhouse any rent which might be due and to discharge any and all liabilities or indebtedness, or both, of Furlong which might exist under the agreements of the lease, in the manner therein specified. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Wetherell v. O'BrienIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Union National Bank v. GoetzIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Bayor v. American Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Kirby v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Robert Fitzsimmons v. Robert Best, Robert Fitzsimmons v. Jersey State Bank and Godfrey State BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  2. People Ex Rel. Scott v. PintozziIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Hewitt v. HayesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  4. In Re Possession & Control of the Commissioner of BanksAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  5. Genesee Wesleyan Seminary v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API