Legal Opinion

Fogg v. Tyler

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 8, 1912PublishedCited by 28 opinions

In equity. On report. Petition filed 'by George W. Maxfield in the matter of the receivership of Tyler, Fogg & Co. asking the court to issue an order directing the receiver of that firm to restore to him a package of money containing $500 in bills, which the petitioner deposited with the cashier of the firm for safe keeping April 22, 1911. At the conclusion of the evidence the case was reported to the Law Court for determination. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtWhitehouse, C. J.

This is a petition filed by George W. Maxfield in the matter of the receivership of Tyler, Fogg & Co. asking the court to issue an order directing the receiver of that firm to restore to him a package of money containing $500 in bills, which the petitioner deposited with the cashier of the firm for safe keeping April 22, 1911.

It is contended on the part of the petitioner that this was a special deposit which was not to be mingled with the general funds of the bank and form a part of its disposable capital, but was to be kept by it and be specifically returned. On the other hand, it is •…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Harrison v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  3. Farmers' & Mechanics' National Bank v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  4. National Mahaiwe Bank v. PeckMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  5. Mutual Accident Ass'n of the Northwest v. JacobsIllinois Supreme Court · 1892

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Washington Shoe Manufacturing Co. v. DukeWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Carlson v. KiesWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Bryan, as Admrx. Coconut Grove Bank Tr. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
  4. State Ex Rel. School District No. 4 v. McGrawMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Northern Sugar Corporation v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API