Legal Opinion

Reinhard v. Virginia Lead Mining Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1891PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Franldin Circuit Court. — Hon. Rudolph Hiezel, Judge. (1) For the grant of an immediate estate in possession the grantee must be in esse, and the deed may be avoided by showing that the grantee came into being after the delivery of the deed. Hulick v. Scovill, 4 Grilm. (111.) 191; Miller v. Chittenden, 2 Iowa, 368; Hall v. Leonard, 1 Pick. ( Mass.) 27; Morris v. Stephens, 46 Pa. St. 200 ; Hornbeek v. Westbrook, 9 Johns.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Franldin Circuit Court. — Hon. Rudolph Hiezel, Judge. (1) For the grant of an immediate estate in possession the grantee must be in esse, and the deed may be avoided by showing that the grantee came into being after the delivery of the deed. Hulick v. Scovill, 4 Grilm. (111.) 191; Miller v. Chittenden, 2 Iowa, 368; Hall v. Leonard, 1 Pick. ( Mass.) 27; Morris v. Stephens, 46 Pa. St. 200 ; Hornbeek v. Westbrook, 9 Johns. (N. Y.) 73 ; Chase ¶. Palmer, 29 111. 306 ; Douthitt v. Stinson, 63 Mo. 268; Frank v. Drinkhahn, 76 Mo. 508. (2) Under the general corporation laws of Missouri a…

1Opinion of the CourtMacfarlane, J.

This is a suit in equity to quiet the title to certain real estate of which plaintiffs claim they are the owners.

The material facts are undisputed. On the nineteenth day of December, 1872, Nathaniel Sands and Rowland R. Hazard, in the city of New York, executed and acknowledged in due form a certificate in writing for the purpose of incorporating under the laws of the state; of Missouri a mining company, and adopted as the eor< porate name, “ The Virginia Lead Mining Company.” This certificate of incorporation shows a full compliance-with the laws of this state up to and including its proper…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. National Bank v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Jones v. Cincinnati Type Foundry Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Douthitt v. StinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  4. Martin v. FewellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  5. Granby Mining & Smelting Co. v. RichardsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Reid v. BarrySupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. Bradley v. ReppellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  3. Doty v. PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  4. City of Sedalia ex rel. Gilsonite Construction Co. v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  5. City of Sedalia ex rel. Gilsonite Construction Co. v. MontgomeryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API