Legal Opinion

Jones v. Cincinnati Type Foundry Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1860PublishedCited by 38 opinions

APPEAL from the Grant Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Suit upon a promissory note.

“ The Cincinnati Type Foundry Company, a corporation,” *90&c., “'complains of David W. Jones, defendant,” &c., upon . a promissory note, of which a copy is set out thus:

“$279. Indianapolis, Indiana, October 11, 1857.

'“ Six months after date, I promise to pay to the order of the Cincinnati Type Foundry Company, two hundred and seventy-nine dollars, for value received, without relief from valuation laws. David W. Jones.”

The defendant demurred to the complaint. The demurrer was overruled, and rightly.

The defendant then answered—

1. That he was not indebted to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Society for the Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts v. Town of PawletSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  2. Jones v. Bank of TennesseeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1847
  3. Newell v. GatlingIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Byrd v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1834

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Heaston v. Cincinnati & Fort Wayne RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Bennett v. PrestonIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Roe v. DoeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Brown v. Scottish-American Mortgage Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Farmers & Merchants Insurance ex rel. Benneson v. NeedlesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API