Legal Opinion

Martin v. Fewell

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1883PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from Henry Circuit Court. — Hon. E. E. Wright, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtHough, C. J.

This is an action of assumpsit, by plaintiffs as partners, against defendants as partners. There are-three counts in the petition. The first is to recover judgment for goods alleged to have been sold by plaintiffs to defendants, March 30th, 1877, amounting to $553.89; the second count is for goods sold August 14th, 1877, amounting to $72.09 ; and the third is for goods sold October 9th, 1877, amounting to $422.40. In addition to the usual averments as to the sale and delivery of the goods, each count contains substantially the following allegations: That at the time of said sales the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bigelow v. GregoryIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Abbott v. Omaha Smelting & Refining Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Ferris v. ThawSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  4. Richardson v. PittsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  5. Pettis v. AtkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1871

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Sparks v. Dispatch Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  2. Harrill v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  3. Queen City Furniture & Carpet Co. v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  4. Darling v. BuddySupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  5. Stone v. GuthMissouri Court of Appeals · 1937

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API