Legal Opinion

Brown v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 30, 1971No. 623-2PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.

Petitioner, Carol Brown, seeks a writ of mandamus to compel Judge William L. Brown, Jr., of the ■Superior Court for Pierce County, to enter an order that Pierce County Cause No. 205182 be maintained as a class •action under Rule 23 of the Civil Rules. A motion to maintain a class action was originally denied in that court. Petitioner and five intervening plaintiffs are challenging the policies of respondent, the City of Tacoma’s Department of Public Utilities, regarding the cutting off of utility services .for alleged arrearages and the requirement that some customers post a deposit to obtain…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  2. Richard JOHNSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GEORGIA HIGHWAY EXPRESS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  3. Esplin v. HirschiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
  4. Bernard v. Beneficial Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. William Harris v. Palm Springs Alpine Estates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. King v. RivelandWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Smith v. Behr Process Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  3. Smith v. Behr Process Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  4. Scott v. Cingular WirelessWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Scott v. Cingular WirelessWashington Supreme Court · 2007

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API