Legal Opinion
Kaufman & Broad Central Valley, Inc. v. City of Modesto
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 15, 1994No. F019464PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BUCKLEY, J.
The City of Modesto (City) appeals from a judgment granting a petition for writ of mandate filed by Kaufman & Broad Central Valley, Inc. (Kaufman & Broad). The writ ordered the City to refund, with interest, development impact fees it had collected from Kaufman & Broad in excess of those in effect when Kaufman & Broad’s vesting tentative subdivision map for its River Terrace subdivision was deemed complete on June 22, 1988.
In this opinion, we hold that the due process notice requirements implicit in the vesting tentative map statutes limit increases in developer’s fees to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Avco Community Developers, Inc. v. South Coast Regional CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Redevelopment Agency v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Youngblood v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Garrick Development Co. v. Hayward Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Russ Building Partnership v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Building Industry Assn. of Central California v. City of PattersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Crenshaw Subway Coalition v. City of L.A.California Court of Appeal · 2022
- Redondo Beach Waterfront, LLC v. City of Redondo BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Scripps Health v. nThrive Revenue Systems, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Tarbet v. East Bay Municipal Utility Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2015