Legal Opinion

Thomson Mach. Co. v. Sternberg

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 8, 1931No. 8487PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODWARD, District Judge.

This matter came up for hearing on defendant’s exceptions to the-master’s report. Preceding the argument on the merits, counsel for plaintiff raised the preliminary question that the exceptions were indefinite and insufficient.

The matter in issue was largely a question of fact. The terms and conditions of a contract of employment were involved. The practical construction which the parties thereto had given the contract was also involved. The master’s report is a record of nearly five hundred pages of testimony and exhibits to the number of one hundred or more. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sheffield & Birmingham Coal, Iron & Railway Co. v. GordonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Carlisle v. Mercantile Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
  3. Fordyce v. Omaha, Kansas City & E. R. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1906
  4. General Fire Extinguisher Co. v. LamarCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1905
  5. Neal v. BriggsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern North Carolina · 1901

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fleischer Studios, Inc. v. Ralph A. Freundlich, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1936
  2. Savage v. Monarch Royalty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API